The rise of the #RegressiveLeft in
recent years in the West has left many regular people confused about
how this happened in the first place. I'm about to make a couple of
ugly comparisons to prove a point, so consider this your 'trigger
warning' if you're easily offended. We've been trained to think that
authoritarian movements gain purchase during times of economic
upheaval and unrest. Case in point, see the rise of the Bolsheviks in
the Soviet Union, which was caused by a confluence of economic
problems including agrarian and labor issues, as well as issues
related to the educated class, among others that were not solved in
the 1905 revolution; Russian activity in WWI would be the catalyst
that allowed the authoritarian movement to win final victory and
found the USSR.
The second example is the uglier one,
the rise of the Nazism in Germany. As is well document, the rise of
Nazism can directly be linked to the economic conditions imposed on
Germany after losing WWI. Unemployment was rampant, the currency was
worthless, and the government inept to fix conditions imposed by
unfair treaty conditions that left the country helpless to fix its
condition. The political environment was fertile for the rise of a
demagogue.
In comparison, the rise of the
Regressive Left is mystifying. The concept of a Social Justice
Warrior hadn't taken hold prior to the Great Recession, though
conservatives were warning the rest of us about the worst tendencies
in the left for decades running. Even so, the Great Recession was not
even remotely on the same scale of economic instability as the other
mentioned periods were. Instead, Regressives have risen amidst a
condition of plenty and material comfort. The rise of the Regressive
Left bears all the hallmarks of a bourgeoisie movement, coming from
the sheltered ranks of the colleges and middle classes in the US and
UK.
I use the 'b' word on purpose. George
Orwell described the middle classes as the shock absorbers for the
bourgeoisie, as the middle class would take the brunt of the negative
consequences of economics and political disorder while the upper
crust would fare fine. In Orwell's time it was the elites who lead
the leftist movement. Today, as in the leadership of 'Black Lives
Matter' and the rise of the Regressive Left on college campuses,
again we see the children of the elite fighting against perceived
privilege. One wonders if they've ever looked into a mirror.
When I was growing up in the 90s I
distinctly recall spanking being a hot button social issue. Parents
were admonished to put their kids in 'time out' (a sort of precursor
to the safe space today) to punish them instead of giving a few
well-measured swats on the butt. This was the first coddling that
people my age and younger received from society and it's only gotten
worse since. Poor kids weren't coddled, at least at home, but the
children of the middle class certainly were.
The Social Justice Warrior culture is
the direct result of this coddling. When you attend college you take
your first steps into something like the real world. You encounter
ideas that are different than the ones you were raised with, you gain
a modicum of responsibility and you come face to face with the
specter of crushing debt. Add in the propaganda administered in many
classrooms by cultural Marxist professors and the result is a toxic
environment that brainwashes people at a very impressionable age. The
comfort has been altered – not even removed, just altered – and
the result is a troubling environment that is always hostile to the
mind that had previously been coddled. President Obama famously and
rightly said that we shouldn't coddle college students. The problem
is that we are talking about people who have been coddled their
entire lives. The merest reduction in coddling has left these people
unhinged, especially when radical political ideas that prey on the
biases their parents raised them with have been hammered into their
heads.
This is the result of comfort and a
society that hasn't challenged people in a meaningful way in the
lifetimes of the youngest people identifying as SJWs. There hasn't
been a real conflict in the US since the Vietnam era. The Cold War
and its accompanying threat of annihilation is as real to them as the
Civil War – that is, things they read about in school and nothing
more than that. Even 9/11 is historical, as it and the war in Iraq
happened when they were children. Many SJWs barely remember George W
Bush and the culture of terror fear that gripped the US from
2002-2006.
The lack of existential conflict has
lead to really watered down social movements that are themselves
vehicles for authoritarianism. To be sure, the Regressive Left
promotes authoritarianism through raging activism that shows that the
SJW-on-the-street thinks they are the member of the Revolutionary
Vanguard, when really they are merely the shock absorbers for people
like the privileged leaders of BLM. The irony would be funny if the
results weren't terrifying. My only consolation is that the
Regressive Left is failing. The growing movement against the
authoritarian movement they represent illustrates that.
No comments:
Post a Comment