During my time in the collectivist
#RegressiveLeft I fully bought into Democratic Socialism. I believed,
like many do today, that the government shouldn't make my shoes,
build my car, own farms and that kind of thing but was fully willing
to accept government redistribution of wealth programs. For example,
I supported authoritarian measures like limiting individual income as
well as having some rather degenerate opinions on obscenity and other
things that normal people might bristle at.
In 2008 I voted for Barack Obama. I did
it again in 2012. Now I find the idea of voting for a Democrat
repulsive because the party has been completely captured by the
Regressive Left. The feminists and the Social Justice Warriors are in
control of the Democratic party, despite all of the president's words
about not coddling college students. If you need any further proof of
this you need only to look at how Clinton and Sanders trip over
themselves to be more in line with Black Lives Matter despite BLM
being built on an insidious lie.
In those days I would've believed the
BLM lie. I would've been a full-throated Sanders supporter. Many of
my friends bristle when I compare Sanders to Trump. To be perfectly
honest I am far more concerned about Sanders and his demagoguery than
I am with Donald Trump and his brutish language and policy proposals.
Sanders clearly represents the worst bullying tendencies of the
Regressive Left, as is evident by his demonization of the wealthy and
conservatives.
Democrats have been publicly opposed to
the wealthy for a long time. Sanders takes a different approach,
suggesting that a return to a 90% upper tax rate would be
appropriate. Obviously this is a fantasy proposal but what most don't
understand is that it is tyrannical. I still support a progressive
tax rate to some degree though not nearly to the degree I had in the
past. Placing full weight of the tax system on the wealthiest
Americans is tyrannical when that rate becomes oppressive. I see
little difference between this and the jizya
that non-Muslims are forced to pay in Islamic societies. Both rely on
a threat of real violence to enforce.
I had
at one point in my life supported a functional limit on wealth. A 90%
tax rate is a functional income limit. In effect, the state takes the
wealth earned by individuals and seizes it to give to those who have
nothing. To a degree government does this when there is some form of
social safety net. The difference now is that Sanders justifies it
through the use of a distorted concept of social justice that pits
'Americans' against the wealthy elite. Traditionally presidential
candidates wax poetic about the American dream and the ability of any
person to join the wealthy with hard work and smart decision making.
When I
was a Social Justice Warrior I internalized the victim narrative that
is required to believe that the wealthy elite are not Americans –
that the wealthy elite are not human.
I would relish stories from progressive outlets like US Uncut, Air
America, MSNBC and the rest that showed the crimes of the Koch
brothers or demonized Ronald Reagan or suggested that Dick Cheney was
some demonic villain. Part of living in the world of the Regressive
Left is to shut off the part of the brain responsible for critical
thinking. Ideology shuts down the process of dialogue by destroying
the ability of people to critically think.
If
this political season requires anything it is the ability of voters
and the media to think critically. When Donald Trump is smeared by
the media using rhetoric that is eerily similar to that of Bernie
Sanders you know that critical thinking is missing in the debate
today. What is needed now is a return to critical thinking and an
abandonment of ideology. The US and the West broadly is poised for a
new kind of political realignment, one that pits authoritarians
against libertarians. The old Left/Right dominance of politics may be
dead for the foreseeable future. The politics of authoritarianism
relies on the abandonment of critical thinking. It's how a figure
like Trump can be turned into Hitler without actually examining his
political positions. The best criticisms of Trump come from the
political Right, which see him as a moderate. If you only listen to
the mainstream media without investigating him you'll think he is an
arch-conservative. Ideology preys on our inability or lack of desire
to investigate the truth for ourselves. I know this from experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment